Thermodynamics of Solid and Fluid Surfaces

From Soft-Matter
Revision as of 15:36, 16 April 2012 by Redston (Talk | contribs) (Plane Fluid Interfaces - Area Work Term)

Jump to: navigation, search

Entry by Emily Redston, AP 226, Spring 2012

Work in Progress


Thermodynamics of Solid and Fluid Surfaces by J. W. Cahn. Segregation to Interfaces, ASM Seminar Series (1978) pp. 3-23.



In this paper, Cahn provides a slightly different take on Gibbs' original development of the thermodynamics of fluid and solid surfaces. His goal was to develop a mathematical system that was physically equivalent to Gibbs' formulation while being more easily applicable. The key change he made is that he concentrated on the system rather than defining excess quantities by comparing the actual system to a hypothetical system not containing the surface. This avoids problems with the identification of the location of the dividing surface.

Plane Fluid Interfaces - Area Work Term

For surfaces between fluids, Gibbs defined surface tension <math>\sigma</math> in a work term. The quantity <math>\sigma</math> is taken as a force per unit length of surface perimeter. When a portion of the perimeter moves an infinitesimal distance in the place of the surface, the area change <math>dA</math> is the product of perimeter length and distance moved. Thus <math>\sigma dA</math> is a forces-times-distance work term, and it appears in the combined first and second laws of thermodynamics as follows:

<math>dU = TdS - PdV + \displaystyle \sum_{i} \mu_i dN_i + \sigma dA\ [1]</math>

Strictly speaking, <math>\sigma</math> is defined as the change in internal energy when the area is reversibly increase at constant entropy and volume in a closed system.

Gibbs then went on to show that, in equilibrium, temperature and chemical potentials are constant everywhere within the system. For the special case of plane boundaries at equilibrium, pressure is also constant. For a system containing a plane surface, Equation 1 is readily integrated to give:

<math>U = TS - PV + \displaystyle \sum_{i} \mu_i dN_i + \sigma A\ [2] </math>

This can be rearranged to give <math>\sigma</math>, the excess free energy due to the presence of the surface.

<math> \sigma = (1/A) [U - TS + PV - \displaystyle \sum_{i} \mu_i dN_i]\ [3]</math>

Here <math>U - TS + PV</math> is the Gibbs free energy of the system with the interface, and <math>\displaystyle \sum_{i} \mu_i dN_i</math> is the Gibbs free energy without the interface.

Equations [2] and [3] pertain to the entire system. Because most of this system is occupied by homogeneous phases, it is convenient to subtract out their contribution. Thus for homogeneous phases <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math>, we have:

<math> 0 = [U^{\alpha} - TS^{\alpha} + PV^{\alpha} - \displaystyle \sum_{i} \mu_i dN_i^{\alpha}]\ [4]</math>
<math> 0 = [U^{\beta} - TS^{\beta} + PV^{\beta} - \displaystyle \sum_{i} \mu_i dN_i^{\beta}]\ [5]</math>

It is apparent that the homogeneous phases contribute nothing to the RHS of Equation 3, and Equation 3 continues to hold if we remove from our consideration as much of the homogeneous phases as we wish. What is left then is a layer which is think enough to extend into both homogeneous phases. The location of the bounds of this layer parallel to the surface do not matter, except that they must reach far enough into each phase such that there is no longer any influence of the surface. Equations 4 and 5 hold for any incremental addition to the thickness of this layer. If we define the layer content per unit surface area of extensive quantities and denote them by the symbols [U] [S] [V] and [<math>N_i</math>], then <math>\sigma</math>, which was defined as a force per unit length in a work term, is identically equal to the Gibbs free energy of forming this layer containing the surface.