Difference between revisions of "Substrate Curvature Resulting from the Capillary Forces of a Liquid Drop"

From Soft-Matter
Jump to: navigation, search
(Introduction)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
==Introduction==
 
==Introduction==
 
We typically characterize the surface of solids using two thermodynamic quantities:
 
We typically characterize the surface of solids using two thermodynamic quantities:
*surface tension <math>\gamma</math>, which is a scalar equal to the work required to create a unit area of new interface and constant strain in the solid
+
*surface (or interface) tension <math>\gamma</math>, which is a scalar equal to the work required to create a unit area of new interface and constant strain in the solid
*surface stress <math>f_{ij}</math>, which is a 2x2 tensor defined such that the surface work require to strain a unit surface elastically by <math>d {\epsilon}_{ij}</math> is <math>f_{ij} d {\epsilon}_{ij}</math>
+
*surface (or interface) stress <math>f_{ij}</math>, which is a 2x2 tensor defined such that the surface work require to strain a unit surface elastically by <math>d {\epsilon}_{ij}</math> is <math>f_{ij} d {\epsilon}_{ij}</math>
 +
 
 +
In this paper, Spaepen illustrates the difference between these two quantities

Revision as of 16:58, 19 April 2012

Entry by Emily Redston, AP 226, Spring 2012

Work in Progress

Reference

Substrate curvature resulting from the capillary forces of a liquid drop by F. Spaepen. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 44, 675 – 681 (1996)

Keywords

surface tension, interface stress, Young's equation, curvature

Introduction

We typically characterize the surface of solids using two thermodynamic quantities:

  • surface (or interface) tension <math>\gamma</math>, which is a scalar equal to the work required to create a unit area of new interface and constant strain in the solid
  • surface (or interface) stress <math>f_{ij}</math>, which is a 2x2 tensor defined such that the surface work require to strain a unit surface elastically by <math>d {\epsilon}_{ij}</math> is <math>f_{ij} d {\epsilon}_{ij}</math>

In this paper, Spaepen illustrates the difference between these two quantities