Difference between revisions of "Slippery questions about complex fluids flowing past solids"

From Soft-Matter
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 25: Line 25:
[[Image: G2.png|thumb|right|300px|'''Fig. 2''' ]]
[[Image: G2.png|thumb|right|400px|'''Fig. 2''' ]]
[[Image: G3.png|thumb|right|300px|'''Fig. 3''' ]]
[[Image: G3.png|thumb|left|400px|'''Fig. 3''' ]]
Line 34: Line 34:
[[Image: G5.png|thumb|right|300px|'''Fig. 5''' ]]
[[Image: G5.png|thumb|left|300px|'''Fig. 5''' ]]
Line 40: Line 40:
[[Image: G7.png|thumb|right|300px|'''Fig. 7''' ]]
[[Image: G7.png|thumb|left|300px|'''Fig. 7''' ]]

Revision as of 19:52, 2 May 2009

Slippery questions about complex fluids flowing past solids

Authors: Steve Granick, Yingxi Zhu and Hyungjung Lee

Soft matter keywords

Rough surfaces, slip control, hydrophobicity

By Alex Epstein

Abstract from the original paper

Viscous flow is familiar and useful, yet the underlying physics is surprisingly subtle and complex. Recent experiments and simulations show that the textbook assumption of ‘no slip at the boundary’ can fail greatly when walls are sufficiently smooth. The reasons for this seem to involve materials chemistry interactions that can be controlled — especially wettability and the presence of trace impurities, even of dissolved gases. To discover what boundary condition is appropriate for solving continuum equations requires investigation of microscopic particulars. Here, we draw attention to unresolved topics of investigation and to the potential to capitalize on ‘slip at the wall’ for purposes of materials engineering.

Soft matters

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7