# Difference between revisions of "Percolation Model for Slow Dynamics in Glass-Forming Materials"

(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||

Line 16: | Line 16: | ||

For complete relaxation, the system must be able to diffuse over the whole configuration space. That is, there has to be a path that percolates the configuration space. Thus, we can think of a "percolation transition in the configuration space," which corresponds to the glass transition in real space. | For complete relaxation, the system must be able to diffuse over the whole configuration space. That is, there has to be a path that percolates the configuration space. Thus, we can think of a "percolation transition in the configuration space," which corresponds to the glass transition in real space. | ||

− | |||

− | |||

== Hard spheres == | == Hard spheres == | ||

+ | |||

+ | [[Image:glass_config_fig1.jpg|thumb|300px| Fig 1. Schematic of allowed regions in configuration space for hard spheres. (a) <math>\phi = \phi_J </math>, only jammed states (discrete points in the config space) are allowed. (b) <math>\phi < \phi_J </math>, motion occurs in closed mobility domains surrounding jammed states. (c) Even smaller <math>\phi</math>, bridges between mobility domains occur. (d) Even smaller <math>\phi</math>, percolation occurs (shaded yellow).]] | ||

+ | |||

+ | Hard spheres interact with infinite repulsion upon contact. At small volume fraction <math>\phi</math>, hard spheres behave like fluids. As <math>\phi</math> increases to <math>\phi_J \approx 0.64</math>, the system becomes collectively jammed. In such state no motion can occur, because any particle displacement will lead to overlap. Therefore only discrete set of points in the configuration space are allowed (fig 1a). | ||

+ | |||

+ | At slightly lower <math>\phi</math>, particles can move around a little bit. Therefore, the discrete points become ''mobility domains'' in the configuration space (fig 1b). Further decrease of <math>\phi</math> lead to connection between these mobility domains (fig 1c), and eventually to a percolation between these domains (fig 1d) at <math>\phi=\phi_P</math>. | ||

+ | |||

+ | Denote the volume fraction of mobility domains in the configuration by <math>\Pi</math>. Percolation occurs at a critical <math>\Pi_P</math>. When <math>\Pi > \Pi_P</math>, the system can explore the whole configuration space, and it is a metastable liquid. When <math>\Pi < \Pi_P</math>, the system can only diffuse in finite regions of the configuration space, and it is a glass. The distance it can explore is set by the percolation correlation length <math>\xi</math>, which diverges to infinite at <math>\Pi_P</math>. | ||

+ | |||

+ | The authors then describe the percolation with mean-field theory. Following several known scaling laws, they show that the stretching exponent varies with time and satisfies <math>1/3 \leq \beta \leq 1</math>, agreeing with experimental observations. | ||

+ | |||

+ | With a few more assumptions, they further predicts the scaling of <math>\alpha</math>-relaxation time to be | ||

+ | |||

+ | <math>q^2 \tau_{\alpha} \propto \left\{ | ||

+ | \begin{array}{ll} | ||

+ | \exp\left(\frac{A \phi_J}{\phi_J-\phi}\right)(\phi_P-\phi)^{-2} & \textrm{for } \phi_P-\phi \ll \phi_J-\phi_P\\ | ||

+ | \exp\left(\frac{B \phi_J}{\phi_J-\phi}\right) & \textrm{for } \phi_P-\phi \gg \phi_J-\phi_P | ||

+ | \end{array} \right. </math>, | ||

+ | |||

+ | where <math>q</math> is the scattering wave number, and <math>A</math>, <math>B</math> are positive constants. | ||

== Finite energy barriers == | == Finite energy barriers == | ||

+ | |||

+ | Bonds form for systems with a finite energy barrier. In such case, the configuration space can be decomposed into basins of attraction surrounding each local energy minimum. At short times the system is confined to a basin, whereas at long times it can hop from one basin to another. | ||

+ | |||

+ | Again using mean-field arguments, the authors come up with analogous expression for <math>\beta</math> and for <math>\tau_{\alpha}</math>. | ||

+ | |||

+ | == Soft matter discussion == | ||

+ | |||

+ | The glass transition is one of the largest outstanding questions in soft matter. The approach proposed by these authors are dramatically different from the traditional standpoint, yet explains the observed phenomena equally well. This approach may shed some light, and hopefully lead to new predictions and better understanding of the glass-formation materials. |

## Latest revision as of 00:12, 24 November 2010

Entry: Chia Wei Hsu, AP 225, Fall 2010

G. Lois, J. Blawzdziewicz, and C. S. O'Hern, "Percolation Model for Slow Dynamics in Glass-Forming Materials", Phys. Rev. Lett. **102**, 015702 (2009).

## Contents

## Summary

In this work, the authors propose an alternate approach to understand the glass transition. Instead of looking at the real space, they focus on the configuration space of the system. There are mobility regions in the configuration space, and the percolation of these regions corresponds to a glass-to-liquid transition. With a mean-field description of such percolation, they show that the stretched-exponential response functions typical of glassy systems can be explained.

## Background

Glassy systems exhibit several unique properties. During a glass transition, the structural relaxation time increases by several orders of magnitude. Also, the structural correlations display an anomalous stretched-exponential time decay: <math>exp(-t/\tau_{\alpha})^{\beta}</math>, where <math>\beta</math> is called the stretching exponent, and <math>\tau_{\alpha}</math> is called the <math>\alpha</math>-relaxation time. Although the stretched-exponential relaxation is universal among glass-forming materials, <math>\beta</math> and <math>\tau_{\alpha}</math> are not. They depend on temperature and density, and they vary from one material to another.

## Basic Idea

The basic idea is that, instead of focusing on the heterogeneous dynamics and percolation in real space (the traditional approach), the authors focus on the *configuration space* and its connection to the anomalous dynamics.

For complete relaxation, the system must be able to diffuse over the whole configuration space. That is, there has to be a path that percolates the configuration space. Thus, we can think of a "percolation transition in the configuration space," which corresponds to the glass transition in real space.

## Hard spheres

Hard spheres interact with infinite repulsion upon contact. At small volume fraction <math>\phi</math>, hard spheres behave like fluids. As <math>\phi</math> increases to <math>\phi_J \approx 0.64</math>, the system becomes collectively jammed. In such state no motion can occur, because any particle displacement will lead to overlap. Therefore only discrete set of points in the configuration space are allowed (fig 1a).

At slightly lower <math>\phi</math>, particles can move around a little bit. Therefore, the discrete points become *mobility domains* in the configuration space (fig 1b). Further decrease of <math>\phi</math> lead to connection between these mobility domains (fig 1c), and eventually to a percolation between these domains (fig 1d) at <math>\phi=\phi_P</math>.

Denote the volume fraction of mobility domains in the configuration by <math>\Pi</math>. Percolation occurs at a critical <math>\Pi_P</math>. When <math>\Pi > \Pi_P</math>, the system can explore the whole configuration space, and it is a metastable liquid. When <math>\Pi < \Pi_P</math>, the system can only diffuse in finite regions of the configuration space, and it is a glass. The distance it can explore is set by the percolation correlation length <math>\xi</math>, which diverges to infinite at <math>\Pi_P</math>.

The authors then describe the percolation with mean-field theory. Following several known scaling laws, they show that the stretching exponent varies with time and satisfies <math>1/3 \leq \beta \leq 1</math>, agreeing with experimental observations.

With a few more assumptions, they further predicts the scaling of <math>\alpha</math>-relaxation time to be

<math>q^2 \tau_{\alpha} \propto \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \exp\left(\frac{A \phi_J}{\phi_J-\phi}\right)(\phi_P-\phi)^{-2} & \textrm{for } \phi_P-\phi \ll \phi_J-\phi_P\\ \exp\left(\frac{B \phi_J}{\phi_J-\phi}\right) & \textrm{for } \phi_P-\phi \gg \phi_J-\phi_P \end{array} \right. </math>,

where <math>q</math> is the scattering wave number, and <math>A</math>, <math>B</math> are positive constants.

## Finite energy barriers

Bonds form for systems with a finite energy barrier. In such case, the configuration space can be decomposed into basins of attraction surrounding each local energy minimum. At short times the system is confined to a basin, whereas at long times it can hop from one basin to another.

Again using mean-field arguments, the authors come up with analogous expression for <math>\beta</math> and for <math>\tau_{\alpha}</math>.

## Soft matter discussion

The glass transition is one of the largest outstanding questions in soft matter. The approach proposed by these authors are dramatically different from the traditional standpoint, yet explains the observed phenomena equally well. This approach may shed some light, and hopefully lead to new predictions and better understanding of the glass-formation materials.