# Difference between revisions of "Interfacial Polygonal Nanopatterning of Stable Microbubbles"

(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

− | |||

− | |||

Authors: E. Dressaire, R. Bee, D. C. Bell, A. Lips, and H. A. Stone. | Authors: E. Dressaire, R. Bee, D. C. Bell, A. Lips, and H. A. Stone. | ||

Line 6: | Line 4: | ||

==Keywords== | ==Keywords== | ||

− | Ostwald ripening, | + | [[Ostwald ripening]], microbubbles, amphiphiles. |

==Summary== | ==Summary== | ||

− | The article presents a new method to stabilize micron-size bubbles by adding a surfactant layer covering the surface of the microbubbles. It also reports the formation of hexagonal and pentagonal surface patterning of the microbubbles. The pattern size and bubbles radius depend on how long the sample was sheared and the shear rate used. The concentration of surfactant was also varied but this showed no effect on bubble radius and only a small change in pattern size was observed. A molecular model describing this phenomenon was also developed and it predicts that the packing of the surfactant molecules is what controls the pattern structure and stability of the bubbles. | + | The article presents a new method to stabilize micron-size bubbles by adding a phospholipid surfactant layer covering the surface of the microbubbles. It also reports the formation of hexagonal and pentagonal surface patterning of the microbubbles. The pattern size and bubbles radius depend on how long the sample was sheared and the shear rate used. The size of the bubbles decreased as the shearing time was increased and as the shear rate increased. The concentration of surfactant was also varied but this showed no effect on bubble radius and only a small change in pattern size was observed. A molecular model describing this phenomenon was also developed and it predicts that the packing of the surfactant molecules is what controls the pattern structure and stability of the bubbles. |

==Soft Matter Connection== | ==Soft Matter Connection== | ||

− | The patterning observed on the surface of the bubbles is quantitatively explained by the molecular model developed. Initially the bubbles are covered smoothly by surfactant, as time progresses the smooth surface begins to buckle at 120 degree angles until eventually the hexagonal patterning forms. The model assumes each hexagon or pentagon in the pattern to have a spherical cap of radius <math>R_c</math> and a bubble radius of ''a''. The domain size can be estimated by the following equation describing the minimization of energy of the microbubbles: | + | The patterning observed on the surface of the bubbles is quantitatively explained by the molecular model developed. Initially the bubbles are covered smoothly by surfactant, as time progresses the smooth surface begins to buckle at 120 degree angles until eventually the hexagonal patterning forms. The model assumes each hexagon or pentagon in the pattern to have a spherical cap of radius <math>R_c</math> and a bubble radius of ''a'', as shown in one of the figures below. The domain size can be estimated by the following equation describing the minimization of energy of the microbubbles: |

<math>E(a, R_c) = n(A \frac{\kappa}{2} (\frac{2}{R_c} - \frac{2}{R_{sp}})^2 + \lambda \pi a) - pV</math> | <math>E(a, R_c) = n(A \frac{\kappa}{2} (\frac{2}{R_c} - \frac{2}{R_{sp}})^2 + \lambda \pi a) - pV</math> | ||

− | where <math>\kappa</math> is the bending rigidity, <math>R_sp</math> is the spontaneous radius of curvature of the surfactant layer, ''p'' is the Laplace pressure, ''n'' is the total number of domains, ''V'' is volume, and <math>\lambda</math> is the line tension energy. | + | where <math>\kappa</math> is the bending rigidity, <math>R_sp</math> is the spontaneous radius of curvature of the surfactant layer, ''p'' is the Laplace pressure, ''n'' is the total number of domains, ''V'' is volume, and <math>\lambda</math> is the line tension energy. In order to test that indeed the packing of the surfactant molecules controls pattern structure, the authors tested a phospholipid surfactant with a smaller headgroup. As concentration of this new surfactant was increased, the hexagonal domains were seen to increase in size until eventually they disappeared on the surface of the bubbles. |

+ | |||

+ | The nanopatterned microbubbles were observed to remain stable in size and composition even after one year of preparation. The use of self-assembly of phospholipid surfactants to stabilize two-phase systems such as emulsions can be very useful. For example, phospholipid surfactants can be added to polymeric nano- and microparticles used for drug delivery and imaging (e.g. ultrasound contrast agents) to increase shelf-life without compromising biocompatibility. It would also be interesting to see if different types of surfactants are able to produce different patterning structures. | ||

+ | |||

+ | |||

+ | [[Image:microbubbles1.png]] | ||

+ | |||

+ | Fig 1. (A) Cryo-SEM image of dispersion. (B) & (C) TEM images of microbubbles after 2 hr aeration covered with hexagons ~50-100 nm in diameter. (D) Cryo-SEM image of bubbles. (E) Cryo-TEM image of bubbles. | ||

+ | |||

+ | [[Image:microbubbles2.png]] | ||

+ | |||

+ | Fig. 2 (A) TEM of microbubble after 20 min aeration. (B) TEm of microbubble with non-patterned areas. (C) TEM of bubble prepared in a less viscous matrix. (D) Evolution from smooth to patterned structure. (E) Schematic of interfacial structure. (F) Structures of sucrose mono- (S) and distereate (2S) (surfactants used). |

## Latest revision as of 05:12, 24 November 2009

Authors: E. Dressaire, R. Bee, D. C. Bell, A. Lips, and H. A. Stone.

Science 320 (5880), 1198-1201 (2008).

## Keywords

Ostwald ripening, microbubbles, amphiphiles.

## Summary

The article presents a new method to stabilize micron-size bubbles by adding a phospholipid surfactant layer covering the surface of the microbubbles. It also reports the formation of hexagonal and pentagonal surface patterning of the microbubbles. The pattern size and bubbles radius depend on how long the sample was sheared and the shear rate used. The size of the bubbles decreased as the shearing time was increased and as the shear rate increased. The concentration of surfactant was also varied but this showed no effect on bubble radius and only a small change in pattern size was observed. A molecular model describing this phenomenon was also developed and it predicts that the packing of the surfactant molecules is what controls the pattern structure and stability of the bubbles.

## Soft Matter Connection

The patterning observed on the surface of the bubbles is quantitatively explained by the molecular model developed. Initially the bubbles are covered smoothly by surfactant, as time progresses the smooth surface begins to buckle at 120 degree angles until eventually the hexagonal patterning forms. The model assumes each hexagon or pentagon in the pattern to have a spherical cap of radius <math>R_c</math> and a bubble radius of *a*, as shown in one of the figures below. The domain size can be estimated by the following equation describing the minimization of energy of the microbubbles:

<math>E(a, R_c) = n(A \frac{\kappa}{2} (\frac{2}{R_c} - \frac{2}{R_{sp}})^2 + \lambda \pi a) - pV</math>

where <math>\kappa</math> is the bending rigidity, <math>R_sp</math> is the spontaneous radius of curvature of the surfactant layer, *p* is the Laplace pressure, *n* is the total number of domains, *V* is volume, and <math>\lambda</math> is the line tension energy. In order to test that indeed the packing of the surfactant molecules controls pattern structure, the authors tested a phospholipid surfactant with a smaller headgroup. As concentration of this new surfactant was increased, the hexagonal domains were seen to increase in size until eventually they disappeared on the surface of the bubbles.

The nanopatterned microbubbles were observed to remain stable in size and composition even after one year of preparation. The use of self-assembly of phospholipid surfactants to stabilize two-phase systems such as emulsions can be very useful. For example, phospholipid surfactants can be added to polymeric nano- and microparticles used for drug delivery and imaging (e.g. ultrasound contrast agents) to increase shelf-life without compromising biocompatibility. It would also be interesting to see if different types of surfactants are able to produce different patterning structures.

Fig 1. (A) Cryo-SEM image of dispersion. (B) & (C) TEM images of microbubbles after 2 hr aeration covered with hexagons ~50-100 nm in diameter. (D) Cryo-SEM image of bubbles. (E) Cryo-TEM image of bubbles.

Fig. 2 (A) TEM of microbubble after 20 min aeration. (B) TEm of microbubble with non-patterned areas. (C) TEM of bubble prepared in a less viscous matrix. (D) Evolution from smooth to patterned structure. (E) Schematic of interfacial structure. (F) Structures of sucrose mono- (S) and distereate (2S) (surfactants used).