Difference between revisions of "Hydrodynamics of Writing with Ink"

From Soft-Matter
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 16: Line 16:
 
==Physics of Writing==
 
==Physics of Writing==
 
The spreading force caused by the energetic gain of wetting the surface has to be balanced with the viscous shear force holding it back. Letting <math>f</math> be the roughness (total surface area over projected area, <math>f >= 1</math>), the difference in surface energies reduces to
 
The spreading force caused by the energetic gain of wetting the surface has to be balanced with the viscous shear force holding it back. Letting <math>f</math> be the roughness (total surface area over projected area, <math>f >= 1</math>), the difference in surface energies reduces to
<math>r ~ (\phi \frac{\gamma}{\mu}h)^{1/2}t^{1/2}</math>
+
<math>r \sim (\phi \frac{\gamma}{\mu}h)^{1/2}t^{1/2}</math>
  
  
 
==Experimental Results==
 
==Experimental Results==

Revision as of 15:46, 17 October 2012

Original entry: Tamas Szalay (APPHY225 2012)

"Hydrodynamics of Writing with Ink"

Jungchul Kim, Myoung-Woon Moon, Kwang-Ryeol Lee, L. Mahadevan, and Ho-Young Kim

Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 264501 (2011)


Summary

In this paper, the authors examine the hydrodynamics of writing with ink on paper with a capillary source, eg. a fountain pen. The experiment is performed with a model system of superhydrophilic silicon micropillars to create the rough surface, and a simple glass capillary tube with various solutions inside to simulate the pen. In this model system, they calculate the expected rate of spreading for a stationary pen, and use this to derive the line width for a moving pen, which they then compare to experimental results. The analysis is then extended to a system using actual ink and paper.

Soft matter keywords

Wetting, Laplace pressure, surface tension, spreading, capillary

Physics of Writing

The spreading force caused by the energetic gain of wetting the surface has to be balanced with the viscous shear force holding it back. Letting <math>f</math> be the roughness (total surface area over projected area, <math>f >= 1</math>), the difference in surface energies reduces to <math>r \sim (\phi \frac{\gamma}{\mu}h)^{1/2}t^{1/2}</math>


Experimental Results