Difference between revisions of "Folding of Electrostatically Charged Beads-on-a-String: An Experimental Realization of a Theoretical Model"
|Line 1:||Line 1:|
Entry by [[Emily Redston]], AP 225, Fall 2011
Entry by [[Emily Redston]], AP 225, Fall 2011
Latest revision as of 02:54, 3 December 2011
Entry by Emily Redston, AP 225, Fall 2011
Another review is: "Folding of Electrostatically Charged Beads-on-a-String: An Experimental Realization of a Theoretical Model", Reches, M., Snyder, P.W., and Whitesides, G.M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2009, 106, 17644-17649.
Folding of Electrostatically Charged Beads-on-a-String: An Experimental Realization of a Theoretical Model by Reches, M., Snyder, P.W., and Whitesides, G.M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2009, 106, 17644-17649.
The folding of linear polymers in solution is a subject of enormous importance in areas ranging from materials science to molecular biology. In exploring folding, theorists have developed models at every level of complexity. One of the simplest and most useful of these conceptual models is the beads-on-a-string model (a cornerstone of theoretical polymer science). This model represents each monomer of the polymer as a bead, and the backbone of the chain as a flexible string. It has been the basis for many computational models of folding. All theoretical models are, however, necessarily incomplete, and their failure to capture the full complexity of reality stimulates the development of more complex theory. Here, the authors defied the conventional strategy of using complex theory to try to rationalize an even more complex reality; they developed a very simple experimental system to match the simplest theory. They designed a physical model of beads-on-a-string.
Using a physical system composed of beads of two materials threaded in a defined sequence on a flexible string, they are able to examine the predictions of theoretical beads-on-a-string models. It is a very nice design for several reasons: (1) it is 2-D, (2) the interactions among the beads are electrostatic, (3) the shapes of the beads and properties of the string can be controlled, and (4) the agitation of the beads is well defined. Examination and comparison of two models—one physical and one theoretical— offers a new approach to understanding folding, collapse, and molecular recognition at an abstract level. In particular, they are able to explore the influence of the flexibility of the string and the shape of the beads on the pattern and rate of folding using their model. This system, although much simpler than molecular polymers in 3-D solution, still includes the inevitable nonlinearities of a real physical system. It is designed to extend and to simulate 2-D calculations of beads-on-a-string models of polymer folding and collapse.
They made the beads-on-a-string system by threading sequences of spherical or cylindrical Nylon and Teflon beads on a thin flexible string. They used beads that were easy to handle and machine. To increase the visual contrast between the Teflon and Nylon beads, Nylon beads were stained with a neutral organic dye. These beads were separated by smaller PMMA spherical beads. The smaller, uncharged beads define the distances between the larger beads, and control the flexibility of the string.
Upon agitation on a surface located in the middle of the triboelectric series, Teflon and Nylon beads develop electrostatic charges of similar magnitudes and at similar rates, but with opposite electrical polarities: Teflon charges negatively and Nylon positively. The smaller PMMA beads remain essentially uncharged. The resulting electrostatic interactions cause the string to fold (Fig. 1A). The surface on which the beads charged was planar and axially symmetrical, with a slight curvature at the perimeter (Fig. 1B). This geometry helps avoid interactions of the beads with the corners of a sharply defined frame.
A Short-Chain RNA Model
The authors exploited their ability to control the strength of the interactions among the cylindrical beads (by changing their surface area) to create a physical analog of a RNA hairpin. Short, palindromic sequences of RNA are convenient molecules to model because they represent a subset of biologically relevant polymers for which existing theory can accurately predict stabilities and structures of some folded states.
The authors threaded sequences composed of long and short cylindrical beads. They assumed that the net charge on the shorter cylindrical beads would be smaller than that on the longer cylinders, and thus the interactions between these beads would be weaker. Their intention was that the stronger interactions between long cylindrical beads would be analogous to those between base pairs joined by three hydrogen bonds (GC), and that the weaker interactions between shorter cylinders would model those involving two hydrogen bonds (AU).
Using these cylindrical beads, they constructed a palindromic sequence analogous to GGCAUAAUAGCC. They used one spacer bead to introduce stiffness comparable to that of RNA molecules. They studied the folding of this sequence of beads by agitating it on a paper surface; it folded repeatedly into the same hairpin conformation within 5 minutes. This 2-D conformation persisted for at least 1 hour under agitation. The authors believe that this represents the global minimum for this sequence (Fig. 2). This hairpin conformation corresponds to the structure predicted by theory and shown to exist in RNA by experiment. Theoretical calculations for the inverted sequence AAUGCGGCGAUU predict that it will not spontaneously fold into a hairpin structure (i.e., the calculated free energy for formation of a hairpin from a linear sequence in solution is positive). In agreement with this theoretical calculation, the analogous sequence did not fold into a single stable conformation. Instead, it sampled numerous different structures in several experiments (Fig. 2).
The authors presented a very simple yet elegant physical model following the beads-on-a-string theoretical model in this paper. Using this model, one can explore the physical bases of problems in the collapse and folding of molecular polymers. The system emerging from this work bridges simple theoretical and physical models of polymers. Theory and experiment provide alternative and complementary approaches to the study of polymer conformation. The model is experimentally practical, and also retains nonlinearities of the types—although not of the specific detail—that are important in molecular systems. There is still room from improvement since, as the authors note, the charge distribution in this system does not change as the sequence folds (i.e., the sign of charge on the beads remains the same during agitation). Nonetheless, I believe these authors have approached this research from a unique perspective, going for a more simple approach where others have gotten lost in the complexities of other models. They developed a very intuitive model that has a lot of potential to yield some interesting results.