File:Film Thickness vs Disjoining Pressure.jpg

From Soft-Matter
Revision as of 18:00, 12 November 2012 by Gonzalez (Talk | contribs) (Fig. 2. Effective interface potential (left) and corresponding disjoining pressure (right) vs film thickness as predicted by DLVO theory for an aqueous soap film containing 1 m M of 1:1 electrolyte. The local minimum in V(‘), marked by �, gives the eq)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Film_Thickness_vs_Disjoining_Pressure.jpg(610 × 416 pixels, file size: 744 KB, MIME type: image/x-bmp)

Fig. 2. Effective interface potential (left) and corresponding disjoining pressure (right) vs film thickness as predicted by DLVO theory for an aqueous soap film containing 1 m M of 1:1 electrolyte. The local minimum in V(‘), marked by �, gives the equilibrium film thickness in the absence of applied pressure as 130 nm; the disjoining pressure P ¼ �dV=dl vanishes at this minimum. The minimum is extremely shallow compared with the stabilizing energy barrier. To convert kPa to atm, divide by 102. mN=m ¼ dyn=cm ¼ ergs=cm2.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current18:00, 12 November 2012Thumbnail for version as of 18:00, 12 November 2012610 × 416 (744 KB)Gonzalez (Talk | contribs)Fig. 2. Effective interface potential (left) and corresponding disjoining pressure (right) vs film thickness as predicted by DLVO theory for an aqueous soap film containing 1 m M of 1:1 electrolyte. The local minimum in V(‘), marked by �, gives the eq
  • You cannot overwrite this file.

The following page links to this file: