Difference between revisions of "Crystallization in Patterns: A Bio-Inspired Approach"

From Soft-Matter
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 
== Soft Matter ==
 
== Soft Matter ==
 +
[[Image:biocrystallization-fig2.jpg|thumb|600px|right|alt=Experimental set-up.|'''Figure 2:''' Schematic illustration of the experimental steps for the fabrication of micropatterned substrates used in the crystal growth experiments: a) microcontact printing, b) topographically assisted self-assembly, and c) mechanism of localized crystal growth.]]
  
Currently writing...
+
The key to growing the artificial crystals is to create a template with nucleation sites that will determine where growth occurs and possibly how it grows. Experimental techniques that have focused on mimicking crystal nucleation as governed by membranes use molecular assemblies (e.g. Langmuir monolayers, self-assembled monolayers (SAMs), surfactant aggregates, etc.) to pattern nucleation. Alternatively, experimental techniques that have focused on mimicking organic growth modifiers or ions/proteins in solutions use various additives to focus calcium carbonate precipitation into patterned crystalline structures.  The research presented in this paper focused on SAMs since then allow one to both precisely pick the sites of nucleation, but also control some of the crystal growth orientation and patterning.
 
+
[[Image:biocrystallization-fig2.jpg|thumb|600px|center|alt=Experimental set-up.|'''Figure 2:''' Schematic illustration of the experimental steps for the fabrication of micropatterned substrates used in the crystal growth experiments: a) microcontact printing, b) topographically assisted self-assembly, and c) mechanism of localized crystal growth.]]
+
  
 
[[Image:biocrystallization-fig3.jpg|thumb|850px|center|alt=Sample mircopatterns.|'''Figure 3:''' Examples of micropatterned oriented calcium carbonate films formed on SAM templates.  The substrates in (a-e) and (g) were fabricated using microcontact printing (see Figure 2(a)), while the substrates in (f) and (h) were fabricated using topographically assisted assembly (see Figure 2(b)).  (See Figure 3 in the paper for a more detailed explanation of each film.)]]
 
[[Image:biocrystallization-fig3.jpg|thumb|850px|center|alt=Sample mircopatterns.|'''Figure 3:''' Examples of micropatterned oriented calcium carbonate films formed on SAM templates.  The substrates in (a-e) and (g) were fabricated using microcontact printing (see Figure 2(a)), while the substrates in (f) and (h) were fabricated using topographically assisted assembly (see Figure 2(b)).  (See Figure 3 in the paper for a more detailed explanation of each film.)]]

Revision as of 18:36, 25 October 2009

Original Entry by Michelle Borkin, AP225 Fall 2009

Overview

Biomineralization examples.
Figure 1: Scanning electron micrographs of natural crystaline structures. All examples here are biogenic calcium carbonate structures: a) Dorsal arm plate of the brittle star Ophiocoma wendti. b) Fragment of a mollusk shell structure. c) Wall structure of calcareous sponge Sycon sp. d) Fragment of a coccolith skeleton.

"Crystallization in Patterns: A Bio-Inspired Approach."

J. Aizenberg, Advanced Materials, 2004, 16, 1295-1302.

Keywords

Biomineralization, Artificial Crystallization, Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs), Nucleation

Summary

Many examples in nature can be found of biomineralization in which inorganic salts are assembled to form "functional minearlized tissues". This process occurs in very specific environments and is controlled by cells and various macromolecules. The research presented in this paper is a study of these processes and how to apply them to artificially produce crystals in a "bottom-up" approach. Conventional crystal production techniques take a "top-down" approach: grow one large single crystal and then cut-it-down into pieces meeting the correct size, orientation, etc. requirements. In a "bottom-up" approach, the growth of the crystals are governed by their initial physical and chemical conditions to produce the desired crystal. Examples in nature, as shown in Figure 1, are more complex than contemporary manufacturing technology can produce. Creating an effective approach is of great interest to the materials science industry.


This paper presents strategies for artificially mimicing natural "bottom-up" approaches to crystallization. The experimental set-up's presented attempt to incorporate the following features: crystal nucleation is governed by membranes, crystal properties are adjusted by ionic and soluable "organic growth modifiers", crystals have precise predetermined patterns, and crystallization can occur through a "transformation of a transient amorphous phase". The new experimental approaches presented are able to control during the crystallization process at the micrometer scale the transfer of mass across the surface, the molecular structure, and the sites of nucleation.


Soft Matter

Experimental set-up.
Figure 2: Schematic illustration of the experimental steps for the fabrication of micropatterned substrates used in the crystal growth experiments: a) microcontact printing, b) topographically assisted self-assembly, and c) mechanism of localized crystal growth.

The key to growing the artificial crystals is to create a template with nucleation sites that will determine where growth occurs and possibly how it grows. Experimental techniques that have focused on mimicking crystal nucleation as governed by membranes use molecular assemblies (e.g. Langmuir monolayers, self-assembled monolayers (SAMs), surfactant aggregates, etc.) to pattern nucleation. Alternatively, experimental techniques that have focused on mimicking organic growth modifiers or ions/proteins in solutions use various additives to focus calcium carbonate precipitation into patterned crystalline structures. The research presented in this paper focused on SAMs since then allow one to both precisely pick the sites of nucleation, but also control some of the crystal growth orientation and patterning.

Sample mircopatterns.
Figure 3: Examples of micropatterned oriented calcium carbonate films formed on SAM templates. The substrates in (a-e) and (g) were fabricated using microcontact printing (see Figure 2(a)), while the substrates in (f) and (h) were fabricated using topographically assisted assembly (see Figure 2(b)). (See Figure 3 in the paper for a more detailed explanation of each film.)


New experimental set-up with sample images.
Figures 5 & 6: New experimental approach schematic and sample micropattern (see caption in original figure for more details).