Difference between revisions of "A Design for Mixing Using Bubbles in Branched Microfluidic Channels"

From Soft-Matter
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
"Design for mixing using bubbles in branched microfluidic channels"<br>
 
"Design for mixing using bubbles in branched microfluidic channels"<br>
 
Piotr Garstecki, Michael A. Fischbach, and George M. Whitesides<br>
 
Piotr Garstecki, Michael A. Fischbach, and George M. Whitesides<br>
Applied Physics Letters 86(24) 244108 (2005)
+
Applied Physics Letters <b>86</b>(24) 244108 (2005)
  
 
== Soft Matter Keywords ==
 
== Soft Matter Keywords ==
 
microfluidic, bubbles, laminar mixing, Peclet
 
microfluidic, bubbles, laminar mixing, Peclet
  
[[Image:Garstecki-4.jpg|300px|thumb|right|Figure 1.  Schematic showing introduction of the two liquid streams and formation of slugs.]]
+
[[Image:Garstecki-4.jpg|300px|thumb|right|Figure 1.  Schematic showing introduction of the two liquid streams and formation of air slugs.]]
 
[[Image:Garstecki-1.jpg|300px|thumb|right|Figure 2.  (a) Two fluid streams remain nearly unmixed when bubbles are not present.  (b) Introducing bubbles along with fluid streams causes the two fluids to fold into one another, aiding in diffusive mixing.  Intensity as a function of position across the channel at the specified locations are shown.]]
 
[[Image:Garstecki-1.jpg|300px|thumb|right|Figure 2.  (a) Two fluid streams remain nearly unmixed when bubbles are not present.  (b) Introducing bubbles along with fluid streams causes the two fluids to fold into one another, aiding in diffusive mixing.  Intensity as a function of position across the channel at the specified locations are shown.]]
 
[[Image:Garstecki-3.jpg|300px|thumb|right|Figure 3.  (a) Recirculation rolls between slugs of air.  (b)-(d) Schematics indicating channel design and the paths slugs take through the branches.  As a slug enters one arm, the hydrodynamic resistance in the arm increases, cause the next slug to enter the other arm of the branch.]]
 
[[Image:Garstecki-3.jpg|300px|thumb|right|Figure 3.  (a) Recirculation rolls between slugs of air.  (b)-(d) Schematics indicating channel design and the paths slugs take through the branches.  As a slug enters one arm, the hydrodynamic resistance in the arm increases, cause the next slug to enter the other arm of the branch.]]
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
== Microfluidic Mixing Using Bubbles ==
 
== Microfluidic Mixing Using Bubbles ==
 
+
As shown in Figure 1, the two liquids to be mixed are combined with a stream of air at a microfluidic flow focussing junction.  The liquid streams pinch off air bubbles, which then flow downstream.  This break up is mediated primarily by conservation of mass.  As the thread of air enters the junction, it restricts flow of the two outer liquids.  Pressure builds up in the outer liquid lines, causing the air/liquid interface to deform.  Eventually, the interface detaches from the walls, becomes unstable, and breaks, forming a bubble [1]
  
  
 
----
 
----
[1] any citations?
+
[1] P. Garstecki, H.A. Stone, and G.M. Whitesides, Physical Review Letters <b>94</b> 164501 (2005)

Revision as of 05:58, 3 March 2009

"Design for mixing using bubbles in branched microfluidic channels"
Piotr Garstecki, Michael A. Fischbach, and George M. Whitesides
Applied Physics Letters 86(24) 244108 (2005)

Soft Matter Keywords

microfluidic, bubbles, laminar mixing, Peclet

Figure 1. Schematic showing introduction of the two liquid streams and formation of air slugs.
Figure 2. (a) Two fluid streams remain nearly unmixed when bubbles are not present. (b) Introducing bubbles along with fluid streams causes the two fluids to fold into one another, aiding in diffusive mixing. Intensity as a function of position across the channel at the specified locations are shown.
Figure 3. (a) Recirculation rolls between slugs of air. (b)-(d) Schematics indicating channel design and the paths slugs take through the branches. As a slug enters one arm, the hydrodynamic resistance in the arm increases, cause the next slug to enter the other arm of the branch.
Figure 4. Standard deviation of intensity profiles at different positions along the channel network. Standard deviation of 0.5 indicates unmixed streams, while a standard deviation of 0 indicates perfectly mixed streams. The two streams are nearly homogeneous after passing through roughly 10 branches in the channel.

Summary

This paper details experimental work and simple supporting theory regarding mixing in microfluidic channels. For most microfluidic systems, the Reynolds number remains small (less than 1000), so turbulence is absent and mixing only occurs via diffusion. Typical Peclet numbers in microfluidic channels are on the order of 1e5, indicating that mixing to homogeneity requires length scales on the order of 10 meters. These lengths are not easily achieved on microfluidic devices due to finite substrate limits for fabrication and large pressure drops in the long channels, so the authors propose a novel method of mixing that aid the diffusion process. Using bubbles to fold two liquid streams into one another, greater contact area between the fluids is created, aiding in diffusion.

Practical Application of Research

A drawback to continuous flow microfluidics has been the inability to homogeneously mix streams on-chip. This limits the application of continuous flow microfluidics, as it is difficult to introduce additional reagents or samples to a flow. This passive, on-chip mixing scheme open a new realm of experiments that can take advantage of introduction of precise amounts of fluid at a given spatial or temporal point in a flow.

Microfluidic Mixing Using Bubbles

As shown in Figure 1, the two liquids to be mixed are combined with a stream of air at a microfluidic flow focussing junction. The liquid streams pinch off air bubbles, which then flow downstream. This break up is mediated primarily by conservation of mass. As the thread of air enters the junction, it restricts flow of the two outer liquids. Pressure builds up in the outer liquid lines, causing the air/liquid interface to deform. Eventually, the interface detaches from the walls, becomes unstable, and breaks, forming a bubble [1]



[1] P. Garstecki, H.A. Stone, and G.M. Whitesides, Physical Review Letters 94 164501 (2005)